Επιλογή κόμβων διαφημιστικής προώθησης σε κοινωνικά δίκτυα με εξωτερικότητες
Περίληψη
In this paper we consider symmetrical networks with n nodes where nodes are consumers and the edges connecting them represent their friendship. The topological structures of generalized symmetric networks are in the form of complete network, star network and the circular network. A monopolist must choose if it is better to carry out the initial promotion of the product in a central node or the two central nodes of the symmetric network. With the use of a questionnaire that we have addressed to students of the Mathematics Department of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, we have constructed a social network of friends on Facebook and calculate the main measures of centrality network. We consider a monopolistic enterprise which has the ability to promote the product in two different ways. One is to promote the product to
the node which has the highest centrality value and the other is to promote the product to the nodes that have the two highest centrality values. And for each one way of promoting and selling the product and for each type of centrality we find optimal prices and quantities as well as profit maximizing discounted profits. Given the optimal choice of promoting and selling the product we find the centrality that gives more profit.
Key-Words Symmetrical networks, centrality measures, Monopoly, Profit maximizing discounted earnings, Viral marketing
Πλήρες Κείμενο:
PDFΑναφορές
Moisiadis P. Combinatorial Enumeration. Publications Ziti, 2002.
Moisiadis P. Lectures notes in graphs. Inter-Faculty Master Program On Complex Systems and Networks, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2015.
Domingos P., Richardson M. Mining the Network Value of Customers. In Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '01, pages 57-66, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
Domingos P., Richardson M. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '02, pages 61-70, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
Kempe D., Kleinberg J., Tardos E. Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '03, pages 137-146, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
Bharathi S., Kempe D., Salek M. Competitive Influence Maximization in Social Networks. WINE 2007.
Carnes T., Nagarajan C., Wild S., and Zuylen A. Maximizing influence in a competitive social network: a follower's perspective. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Electronic commerce, ICEC '07, pages 351-360, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.
Borodin A., Filmus Y., Oren J. Threshold models for competitive influence in social networks. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Internet and network economics, WINE'10, pages 539-550, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag .
Goyal S., Kearns M. Competitive Contagion in Networks. STOC 2012, long version forthcoming in Games and Economic Behavior, 2012.
Dubey P., Garg R. and de Meyer B. Competing for Customers in a Social Network: The Quasi-Linear Case, WINE „06, long version in Journal of Dynamics and Games 1, pages 377-409,2006.
Hartline J., Mirrokni V., Sundararajan M. Optimal marketing strategies over social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web, WWW '08, pages 189-198, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM.
Arthur D., Motwani R, Sharma A., Xu Y. Pricing Strategies for Viral Marketing on Social Networks. mimeo., Stanford University,2010.
Goldenberg J., Libai B., Muller E. Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth. Marketing Letters, pages 211-223, August 2001.
Rand W., Rust R. Agent-Based Modeling in Marketing: Guidelines for Rigor. International Journal of Research in Marketing, pages181-193,2011.
Watts D..A Simple Model of Global Cascades in Random Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, pages 5766-5771,2002.
Watts D., Dodds P.S. Influentials, Networks and Public Opinion Formation. Journal of Consumer Research, pages 441-458,2007.
Bloch F., Querou N..Pricing in Social Networks. Games and Economic Behavior, pages 263-281,2013.
Candogan O.,Bimpikis K., Ozdaglar A. Optimal pricing in the presence of local network effects. In Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Internet and network economics, WINE'10, pages 118{132, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag
Fainmesser I., Galeotti A. The Value of Network information. mimeo.Brown University and University of Essex,2014.
Corbo J., Lin S. Optimal Pricing with Positive Network Effects: The Big Benefits of Just a Little Discrimination. ICIS 2012.
Saaskilahti,P. Monopoly Pricing of Social Goods. MPRA, paper 3526, University Library of Munich, 2007.
Jullien B. Competing in Multi-Sided Markets: Divide and Conquer. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, pages186-219, 2011.
Banerji A., Dutta B. Local Network Externalities and Market Segmentation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, pages 605-614, 2009.
Galeotti, A.. Talking, Searching and Pricing. International Economic Review, pages 1159-1174, 2010.
S. Hangal, D. MacLean, M. S. Lam, J. Heer All Friends are Not Equal: Using Weights in Social Graphs to Improve Search. The 4th SNA-KDD Workshop '10, pages 1-7, 2010.
Εισερχόμενη Αναφορά
- Δεν υπάρχουν προς το παρόν εισερχόμενες αναφορές.